“No,
I’m saying that the ratio of children who are legitimately at risk for regular autism is 1:1,367 vs. the ratio for the risk of MMR autism is 1:108
We’re trying to calculate risk vs. risk, and therefore must include the full MMR group in order to accurately calculate the risk for regular autism.
You need to look past getting MMR vs. not getting MMR because the risk extends past that point. or else, you’d be excluding 86,000 children who were really part of that risk.”
Can you explain what you are referring to?
What is regular autism vs MMR autism?
It seems that you are establishing facts, you then take these facts to create an argument.