Doomsday
“Again, not talking about the VALIDITY of the studies. Just that they exist.
I’m saying apples and you’re saying oranges.”
I dont know what that means.
I flipped a coin and said “heads- vaccines cause autism, tails- they don’t ”
It landed on tails.
There, now we have a study proving vaccines cause autism.
Do you agree with the above statement? I’m not saying its a valid study, just that it exists
Note: I made sure to make this a “Only a Vaxxed vs UnVaxxed Study” which I know is important to you .
“Walkefield’s was a “Case Report””
No it is a case sereis.
” and yet CDC and Pro-Vaxxers acknowledge tha as an “vaccine-autism linked study””
Becasue at the time there were no better studies. A Case series certainly raises concerns, but once there is better data available then a case series is no longer as meaningful.
for example if I describe an inserting case series of 13 patients who ate an apple a day and never went to a doctor. Certainly a interesting case series . Then we look back at 95,000 patient’s charts and we see that there is no difference between those who went ate apples and those who didn’t. It is no longer meaningful if you say look here is another guy who ate an apple a day and never got sick, (How do you not know this,? I thought you said you understood medical research, this is a very basic point.)
“but they INSIST there are NO other research papers linking vaccines to autism when there ARE!”
for example….