2cents: Mawson Study: It is not valid.
Here are some reasons why:
1. There was no randomization, people voluntarily signed up and recruited their friends
2. They did not look at medical records, they labeled people as vaccinated” or unvaccinated” based on the word of the mothers
3. This was not a real study “We did not set out to test a specific hypothesis about the association between vaccination and health” (You love making up “basic science” rules, having a hypothesis that you test is areal one that you need
4. What journal was this published in? Is it a reliable journal?
5. Who funded this study, you dont trust pharmaceutical, companies or the CDC, who funded this one?
The CDC Studies you provaxxers support are also FLAWED – yet you accept them as Valid.
Like that MMR – Sibling study which was NOT RANDOMIZED, so Healthy User Bias hid the
MMR Autism Link – yet you accept that as Valid. WHY?
The ProVax Studies are funded by CDC which IS the Vaccine Industry (Owns 55 Vaccine Patents)
and the Researchers have Financial Ties to Vaccine Industry that they don’t disclose – but you
don’t think that INVALIDATES the ProVax Studies! WHY?
The Mawson Study stated that a Larger Study should be done – but CDC Adamantly refuses
to do a Vaxxed vs UnVaxxed Study. WHY?