Dooms,
So explain how your theory would impact the study.
A. The group that recieved the MMR shot, if the MMR increases autism, they should have had a greater rate of autism. The fact that the ratio remains the same shows the MMR isnt a factor.
B. Are you implying that the autism group was diagnosed with autism prior to receiving the MMR vaccine?
C. What would be your theory with regards to siblings of autistic children, they are unlikely to be vaccinated (the term unvaccinated is focused on the MMR, yet the same likely applies to all vaccines). This group has a higher autism rate despite having a lower vaccination rate.
D. The group that did not vaccinate with no siblings that had autism, had a similar rate of autism than those that did vaccinate. If your theory holds water, these children need to be autistic (as this is the factor or bias for not vaccinating), unless the bias is non existent.
E. You apparently wouldn’t vaccinate your children, would you also fall into the ‘user bias’ group?