C. What would be your theory with regards to siblings of autistic children, they are unlikely to be vaccinated (the term unvaccinated is focused on the MMR, yet the same likely applies to all vaccines). This group has a higher autism rate despite having a lower vaccination rate.
The siblings of Autistic Children with Autism were PARTIALLY VACCINATED. The Parents did not give
MMR because they saw Signs of Autism in the younger children.
D. The group that did not vaccinate with no siblings that had autism, had a similar rate of autism than those that did vaccinate. If your theory holds water, these children need to be autistic (as this is the factor or bias for not vaccinating), unless the bias is non existent.
The “group that did not vaccinate…” DID VACCINATE. This is why it is FRAUDULENT for these studies to
call “No MMR” Children “Unvaccinated” when they ARE Vaccinated!
Because of Healthy User Bias, Children who showed Signs of Autism at age 12-15 Months did
not get MMR.
YOUR Theory doesn’t hold water if who gets the MMR is NOT RANDOMIZED!
E. You apparently wouldn’t vaccinate your children, would you also fall into the ‘user bias’ group?
My children were 100% Vaccinated before the dangers of Vaccines became more known.
One child suffers from allergies and sinus infections.