dooms
“Folks, when Someone claims they answered your question, but is EMBARRASSED to write again the
explanation,”
not embarrassed, I just (mistakingly ) assumed you read my posts. copying and pasting the same thing over and over isnt helpful, and frankly makes you seem silly.
but if you insist on my repeating myself sure thing here we go (though forgive me I wont just copy and paste my prior posts, that seems to silly to me)
(and there are NOT five, and it was not repeated dozens of times)
There are 5, and I ditn count them but they were certainly reepated over 20 times by variosu posters
1. There WERE Vaxxed vs UnVaxxed Studies!
“Ubiquiton gets Mad that Antivaxxers won’t accept that Vaxxed Children should be called “Unvaxxed” (because they did not receive ONE Vaccine out of Many).”
I dont get mad, I laugh it is a silly distinction that you (ie the pro-disease camp) made up that has zero basis in reality
If I want to prove an apple a day keeps the doctor away, it doesn’t matter if both groups are also eating oranges. (do you really not recall my using this very example several times)
“2. You won’t accept the results of a Vaxxed vs UnVaxxed Study anyway.
Another LIE! Because Antivaxxers refuse to accept FLAWED Studies such as Vaxxed vs Vaxxed,”
you make up flaws when they dont exist
see #1 above.
#3 all studies have flaws If you dont accept the MMR study for made up flaws a real vaccine vs non-vaccine study would have more flaws.
Take healthy user effect which yoiu misapply to the MMR study.
In someone who never vaccinated, it would apply. In order for someone not to vaccinate they must be either very brain damaged, not care about their kids health /not see doctors regularly. Both of which are MORE likely to be associated with diseases than the actual vaccine.
(even if you disagree with the specific premise, the flaw is still there)
you conclude with “In these studies it is NOT RANDOMIZED (who stops vaccinating) so the studies are BOGUS!”
Well any ethical vaxxed vs fully unvaxxed study wouldnt be randomized either. why would you accept that but not this?
“”CDC gives NO Explanation on why they will not make this Study”
Which brings us to #4 . why should they do one?
theres a guy on my street corner who insist the moon is made of green cheese . NASA wont investigate why?
(Granted, it isnt the best comparison because there is so much more data testifying to the safety of vacciens than the composition of the moon, but the idea still holds)
And finally #5 See truth is hidden’s comment “there are many, many more reasons NOT to vaccinate.”
And this point most people who dont vaccinate isnt based on any real concerns it is based on “many many more reasons” No study in the world , no matter how well designed and how few flaws which as mentioned is impossible) can ever overcome “many many more reasons”
(I do concede that arguably some of these reasons overlap, though I do think each stands alone, if you want to quibble that there arent actually 5 reasons but rather they are 2 I accept that)