Home › Forums › Controversial Topics › Studies on vaccines you might have missed.👨🔬💉🚫 › Reply To: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.👨🔬💉🚫
Daas Yochid. First define “pro-vaccine”.
1. IF someone believes that in theory that vaccines can be beneficial,but the current CDC vaccine schedule is dangerous – is that person pro vaccine or anti vaccine?
2. If someone believes in theory, that vaccines can be beneficial, but the ingredients in today’s
vaccines such as aluminum, formaldehyde, squalene are dangerous – is that person pro vaccine
or anti vaccine?
3. f someone believes in theory, that vaccines can be beneficial, but believes we should go back
to the vaccine schedule of 1980 – 1/4 of the vaccines of today – is that person pro vaccine or anti vaccine?
4. If someone believes in theory, that vaccines can be beneficial, but believes we should do a
vaxxed vs unvaxxed study – to be CERTAIN that the benefits outweigh the risks, is that person
pro vaccine or anti vaccine?
5. Or does “Pro Vaccine” mean a person who blindly believes everything from the CDC and supports the current schedule 72 Vaccines (in 1970 it was only 4 vaccines) and also supports the HUNDREDS MORE VACCINES that are coming to be FORCED against the will on everyone?
I cannot answer your question until you define the definition of “Pro Vaccine”?