“the court has to ruled otherwise!”
Yes obviously, I’m not saying my opinion (nor the lone dissenter’s) Trumps the court (Is that what you thought I meant?)
though it can be done in ways that fit the constituion. see U.S. v. Freed (1971) that I mentioned.
“No, the constitutions protects individuals from corrupt governments that want to impose their tyrannical ideology on the masses.”
So opposing abortions is “corrupt governments that want to impose their tyrannical ideology on the masses.”
After all the supreme court ruled that it was protected. So according to you that now defines opposing it as a “tyrannical ideology”
Do I have this right?
“Would you have any objection for the government to require all the Jews to register themselves in a national database?”
I don’t follow, are Jews dangerous?
” which will NOT prevent gun violence,”
Why not? (probably) helps in Israel
“No, the loophole is private sellers”
I’m not sure what “no” refers to, that is what IVe been saying
“Abdul can show up at a gunshow say “Hi I’m on the no-fly list but I need to buy 20 unregistered guns preferably with large magazines, but I cant pass a background check, please direct me to the private sellers where I can stock up on the 20 guns I need to protect my home from “masked thugs” ””
do you think that is something we should stop or a neccesary evil (or good !?) to avoid penalizing law abiding citizens. by having them register guns (Though for soem reason car registration is not a penalty)