“We are going to be paying out your 55000 over twelve moths so instead of 56$ an hour it’s going to say 42$ an hour.
No big deal it’s the same 55000$ a year.”
No that isnt right if 55,000 is split over 12 months or 10 months it is the same 56 an hour.
You throw in as an afterthought, (as the op did which is what made it hard to understand) “Oh but by the way you will need to work two weeks in the summer to keep your job.”
But that isnt an afterthought at all, THAT is the only change. the change 10 months to 12 months isnt really a change, this line: “In the past, (the hourly) wages were paid over 10 months, this year the same amount was divided over 12 months” is hard to understand.
UB
“Is this called slavery or stam theft?”
Neither, it is called a pay cut. While upsetting, I’m not sure why you would think the Government would care