Reply To: Freedom of Speech

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee Freedom of Speech Reply To: Freedom of Speech

#1882867
n0mesorah
Participant

Dear Milhouse,
This is what I meant.

In 1942, the Supreme Court said that the First Amendment doesn’t protect “fighting words,” or statements that “by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace” Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942).

For you BLM can be based on a lie. For people who live in it, it would be lying to see from without, all that is experienced in the first hand.