“They should not assume that he would start shooting in front of his kids. ”
I dont know anything about the case, and neither does anyone else.
But, using the argument that he had three kids in the car, threatened in front of them that he was going to get his gun and then went to get his gun, shows that he doesn’t necessarily deserve the benefit of the doubt and that the cop shouldn’t assume that he wouldn’t shoot in front of his kids.
Again, I dont know anything about this case and I’m not making any assumptions of my own until more facts are in.