Dear Syag,
You are correct. I am trying to be clear that this is my take on the incident, and not some narrative that I am trying to conform to an agenda. Also, that line was in jest.
It is a bit perplexing why my insistence that the facts are murky, is what gets you upset. Why does it not bother you when someone posts a single minded narrative that could only be known by a bystander?
PS You never even said what you saw that I contradicted. Being that I stated that the evidence is still inconclusive, there is no way that I could dispute your beliefs on the matter. If you have seen a third video please tell me about it