Reply To: Supreme Court Packing

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee Supreme Court Packing Reply To: Supreme Court Packing

#1910241
ubiquitin
Participant

“Part of that rejection means – in plain language – Senate is in R- hands and they have power to withhold consent”

Again, that’s not what happened. Mcconell didn’t even hold hearings. He didnt allow the senate to consent or reject. Mcconell isnt “the senate” he is but one of 100.

“. I think the future court packing part of the argument is more interesting”

Its not. It is 100% justifiable based on Republicans actions.

Simple question what is the republican view on holding confirmation hearings in an election year?
A. Hold them
B. Dont hold them
C. Do what you can changing the rules as you go.

Right now Republicans opted for c. You should expect the dems to follow suit doing what they can to get ahead