“So it is – but that’s the point of the Wiley article. The people that use it, whether in the Medical field or not, Should Stop using it!”
Meh. This may surprise you Oksana H. Baltarowich MD does not get to regulate speech
and more to the point, regardless of what you want to call it. Ectopic pregnancies in the uterus exist. See the Wiley article.
“A.- I don’t care what some dictionaries do – let them read the Wiley article.”
It doesn’t matter what you care about. It matters what lawyers who write the laws (and judges who interpret them) care about, and what dictionary they read What if they dont stumble across the wiley article like you did?
“B. – You can’t call Interstitial pregnancies – Intrauterine, because they are outside the endometrial cavity.”
Stop grasping its in the uterus. period. (and again even if it wasn’t it is still a pregnancy)
Look this conversation is boring. You are the first I’ve heard claim there is no such thing as a pregnancy that threatens the mother’s life. though I did fins a quack who made a similar argument online though she since retracted (referenced above). I have enough experience with you to know you arent capable of retracting.
I have Chazal, and poskim on my side who all refer to cases where a mother’s life is endangered. Sadly I have real world experience too. Nobody I know in real life thinks these things don’t exist. If you are forced to redefine basic words like “pregnancy”, “abortion” and “uterus” to back up your bizarre claim (and if any ONE of those words maintains its Webster’s definition your point is wrong)
If you have any specific question. I’d be happy to answer otherwise believe whatever you want