Reply To: Supreme Court Dismisses Case Creating a Laughter

“Where is the Justice?”
Reb E. SCOTUS frequently will punt on divisive issues leaving them undecided when the public (both side of the dispute) desperately wants closure and a definitive resolution. In this case, the facts didn’t appear to provide a good case in which to deliver the Court’s first decision on this provision of the Constitution and were more a referendum on Trump’s flouting of historical precedents regarding divesting assets and providing full transparency on his income/assets. Bad facts make bad precedent even though the public (myself included) were hoping they would decide the case on its merits, even after the fact.