“The reason I think was to Show Off to e/o.”
That’s true but only partly. As I’ve mentioned in the past my favorite discussions are ones where one is clearly wrong but can’t admit it.
You accused me of lying. What I said would happen is EXACTLY what happened. I find it fascinating that you can’t just say sorry for calling you a liar
“Because that implies that they don’t even read it, but SCOTUS reads their cases & they give decisions (Judgments)!”
No you made that inference. I explicitly said the case wouldbe dismissed as moot. If you didn’t know what that m ant or entailed, that is in you.
“You have an obsession on what’s called hearing on a case.”
I have an obsession with facts.
“It’s like they won’t even look at any evidence.”
Whether they do or don’t is completely irrelevant.
“They look at evidence and they hear/read cases before them!”
First they have to agree to hear the case. This is called granting certiorari. It was not granted in this case. The court refused to hear it.
“Like I said before -“If you would have posted – it’s likely that they wouldn’t have a Full Blown Case, like Perry Mason, I wouldn’t have replied to that Post”!”
Ah, but that’s not what I said, because it would’ve been nonsense. What I said was they would refuse to hear the case, and would dismiss it as moot. You called me a liar. Yet this is EXACTLY what happened