Ubiq -“You did not say “Oh but it still will be heard” , that redefitnion of “heard” only came later.
Instead you said I lied when I said the case would be dismissed. you cited Goyish prohpets to back up your claim .”
There could be more than one reason that the case will be heard. I listed one at that time & another later.
“To which you replied “I think this is another one of your Manipulating Lies!” AFTER I explained it will be dismissed as moot”
Dismissing a case that it won’t be heard, is Not the same as dismissing it because it’s Moot!
“no I told you what heard meant, and you made up your own defintion not found in any dictionary.”
Actually your definition of “heard”, is Not the Legal Definition!
From dictionary.law.com:
Heard comes from Hearing:
“Any proceeding before a Judge or other magistrate, w/o a jury in which evidence and/or argument is presented to determine some issue of fact or both issues of fact and law. Etc.”
So you do this a lot – Most posters are Not in the Legal field, so you can Easily Manipulate them.
That’s why you can post this -“no I told you what heard meant, and you made up your own defintion not found in any dictionary.”
So you see it’s Not my definition, but you used the Layman’s definition.
The reason, I suspect, was to Manipulate e/o that you are Never Wrong because you’re the Know – It – All!!!