Ubiq -“YES! nailed it “….in which evidence and/or argument is presented …” EXACTLY right. A confrence in which the judges discuss among themselves whether to accept the case (whcih is what happened Feb 22), with no evidence or arguments presented. Is NOT a hearing.
It was originally scheduled for Feb 19. Have a look at SCOTUS’s calendar 2/19 was NOT an argument day (argument days marked in red) it was a conference day (marked in green) There were NO arguments there was no evidence presented.
According to the Defitnion YOU provided it was not a hearing.
Hopefullly Health, if you have the tiem to read the correct defitnion of hearing provided by Health, you will see it says exactly what I have been saying. and not as Health has been wrngly claiming that the case was heard.”
It’s Sad that you can’t understand Simple things!
A kindergarten kid has More understanding than You!
“with no evidence or arguments presented. Is NOT a hearing.”
How many times do I have to tell you – that the Motions contained the evidence and they read the Motions?!?
“Have a look at SCOTUS’s calendar 2/19 was NOT an argument day (argument days marked in red) it was a conference day (marked in green) There were NO arguments there was no evidence presented.”
Again, you so don’t understand Simple things!
An argument day is when they declared a Writ of Centorari.
In a conference day, they could have a Hearing.
And that’s what they did and then they made a Judgment to dismiss the case due to Mootness!