“How many times do I have to tell you – that the Motions contained the evidence and they read the Motions?!?”
hopefully no more times. since it isnt correct. The motions contianed evidence on the CASe. The court did not hear the case .
A writ of Certiorari is when a higher court reviews the case of a lower court.
The supreme court DENIED the writ to quote from the Supre court’s order “The petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment is denied. ” (easily available online search (ORDER LIST: 592 U.S.) MONDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2021)
Like everything you’ve said on this topic you have more terms mixed up:
“An argument day is when they declared a Writ of Centorari.
In a conference day, they could have a Hearing.”
This is incorrect.
Argument days are when ” an opportunity for the Justices to ask questions directly of the attorneys representing the parties to the case, and for the attorneys to highlight arguments that they view as particularly important. Arguments are generally scheduled on specified Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday mornings beginning on the first Monday in October, and continuing through the end of April” (see supremecourt . gov where this quote is pulled verbatim)
Conference days are when ” The Justices meet in a private conference to discuss cases argued earlier that week. The Justices also discuss and vote on petitions for review”
It is on conference days (NOT argument days) that Certiori is granted/denied . note Judges conference is PRIVATE. “According to Supreme Court protocol, only the Justices are allowed in the Conference room at this time—no police, law clerks, secretaries, etc” (source UScourts . gov)
There is no hearing, there are no arguments. The Justices discuss cases that had been heard and whether should hear others
“And that’s what they did and then they made a Judgment to dismiss the case due to Mootness!”
Yes As I said they would (though technically not a judgment, they denied certiorari because of its mootness)
Soooooooo I didn’t lie…..
Your’e starting to repeat yourself more , I’m starting to worry you arent reading my posts.
I’ll still gladly reply to nay new information you provide (like definitions of “hearing” that prove you wrong, or correct your mixed up conference/argument days)
and if you have any lingering questions I’ll of course gladly answer
but if you are just going to repeat “judgment of mootness” over and over , then sadly our fun might have to end