Health
“Yes there is.”
As mentioned. At conference ONLY judges are present “According to Supreme Court protocol, only the Justices are allowed in the Conference room at this time—no police, law clerks, secretaries, etc”
you can’t have a “proceeding before a judge” if there are only judges.
“They read the Motions and make decisions, like whether to Grant Certiorari or not.”
This point was never in dispute. This is EXACTLY what happens. (there is no court case, there are no hearings) they read the motions and make decisions. Of course as you said some are read more than others as some may be more vague.
And I told you months ago they would deny Certioari
you called me a liar for my correct prediction
This is what we are arguing about
Yes youve stuck in dozens of wrong facts as well, that Ive explained to you. But don’t get distarcted from the original point
You say “They read the Motions and make decisions, like whether to Grant Certiorari or not.”
As if it is a chidush.
This is what Ive been telling you for months. Of course, I knew what they would decide, so I told you that too
you called me a liar, and Can’t grant that I didn’t lie even when time has proven me right
THAT is the argument
“Now they are interested in Oral Arguments and/or More Evidence, before any Judgment!”
At conference could they provide a ruling on the actual case. IE overrule or uphold the lower courts decision or are there limits on their “judgement” ?