Ubiq -“I already told you why that defitnion didnt help (namely it is a type of LIE ie it is a type of untruth, what I told you was true.”
You keep saying that I should apologize.
No, you should!
Almost e/o knew that they could declare the motion as moot.
So what was your intention to your original post?!?
Again you don’t understand Simple things.
It was a LIE, at the time of your OP!
“You cut off the end of the defintion there “…Fabrications are extremely hurtful because they lead to rumors that can damage someone else’s reputation. Spreading rumors is not only a lie but is also stealing another’s reputation.”
Of course I cut off that part!
It’s Not part of the definition, it’s an example.
That example doesn’t apply here.
As much as your Gaiva doesn’t let you admit that you’re Wrong – I’ll repeat it:
“The Lie of Fabrication”
“Fabrication is telling others something you don’t know for sure is true.”