“What part of this Definition that you don’t Understand?!?”
2 parts:
The part that would apply that definition to a conference, which is NOT a “proceeding before a court”
and the part that would have that trump The Government’s own website which says EXACTLY as I’ve been telling you .
“This question?”
No this one , posed now for the 7th (!!!!) time,:
In which of these scenarios would you say this “lie of fabrication” took place:
1) The guy never did it, teacher asks where is your homework? guy says “The dog ate it”
2) The guy did do his homework , but can’t find it, he has no idea what happened. teacher asks where is your homework? guy says “The dog ate it”
a. The dog really did eat it
b. the dog did not eat it
3) The guy did his homework, he sees his dog rummaging in his knapsack and chewing some papers, but doesn’t see which, when his teacher asks where is your homework ? he says “the dog ate it”
a. The dog really did eat it
b. the dog did not eat it (eg he finds it later on his desk)
4) the guy did his homework, the dog eats it when his teacher asks where is your homework ? he says “the dog ate it”
in which if these 6 cases 1, 2a 2b 3a 3b and 4 would you say a Lie of fabrication took place?