Reply To: not admitting someone else is right

quite a long post ubiq I’m not sure if there’s a word which isn’t either false or illogical but let’s keep things concise–I know long posts can confuse you.

the root of your mistake is that my question to aaq–albeit extremely sensible–is irrelevant to the thread and hence aaq has no reason to answer it.

being as how you don’t understand the relevance of my question, you could have simply said that my question didn’t prove anything.

I’m almost certain I know the answer to my question. if I’d be 100% certain I wouldn’t have phrased it as a question but as a statement. the answer I think aaq will give (if he answers) pertains directly to the topic at hand. let’s ask you–what would you assume is the reason for aaq’s switch?