It’s convenient to ignore logic and go after ad hominem attacks instead…i think everyone here has known shomer shabbos people who do not wear yarmulkahs at work – like I wrote elsewhere, i have a relationship with a board member of KAJ who is one such person, and I have a lot of respect for him, as he is a ben torah who learns a lot.
To disregard a clearly logical stance because you think it’s coming from a place of resent is not indicative of a capacity for analytical thinking, but rather from our secular culture’s view that one is incapable of discussing matters such as women’s issues if kne is not a woman, or perceived racism if one is not a member of the race being targeted. I also can’t care less if you’re chasidish, or what color socks you wear, or your yichus – if you’re saying something that’s not hashkafically sound, I’ll respond, but not on an ad hominem level.
You’ve yet to respond to my logical assertion that asking a question about a hashkafically sensitive topic while giving an option to answer based on a perspective that strips said question from its hashkafic context undermines said hashkofic context.