It’s very simple.
The Constitution unequivocally grants the right of citizens to own firearms.
For those who say it’s that gunpowder isn’t included, that’s simply ridiculous.
Even if it would be true that society would be safer without guns, that still would not justify revoking and undermining the 2nd amendment.
There is indeed a price for freedom.
This same mindset is what led to the ridiculous lockdowns during corona which destroyed jobs and robbed Americans of so many of their basic rights.
All in the name of public health.
But since when is public health an excuse to take away ones GD given rights?
And even if it is the case in select circumstances, who is wise and unbiased enough to only restrict rights in the most dire of circumstances.
So again, even if it would be true that less guns would lead to mass shootings, that doesn’t justify taking away guns just like banning cars in the pursuit of eliminating car crashes would be considered ridiculous.
Katonti