Reply To: Murdaugh Verdict – Circumstantial Evidence without Motive

Milhouse:

A. Specifically what proof existed that he’s guilty? There isn’t any.

B. Circumstantial evidence is, by definition, not proof. Even with circumstantial evidence the accused can be innocent despite the existence of circumstantial evidence.

C. In Beis Din circumstantial evidence can never be sufficient to find guilty of murder.