Reply To: Groff v Dejoy

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee Groff v Dejoy Reply To: Groff v Dejoy

#2182518
commonsaychel
Participant

@akuperma, Your wrong, because case law that they are seeking to overturn Hardison and that effects ALL employers, private employers and public employers. This is the case summary:

(1) Whether the court should disapprove the more-than-de-minimis-cost test for refusing religious accommodations under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 stated in Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hardison; and (2) whether an employer may demonstrate “undue hardship on the conduct of the employer’s business” under Title VII merely by showing that the requested accommodation burdens the employee’s coworkers rather than the business itself.