“Rather, it was used to affirm free religious practice for citizens.”
That includes not being forced to observe another religion. Obviously it would be unconstitutional for the government to ban people from putting up religious signs on their private property. To most of us sane people, it’s also pretty clear that it would be unconstitutional for the government to force people to put up religious signs.
“Expression of religion isn’t establishment. Also true statement.”
Not categorically. There are absolutely ways in which expression COULD be establishment if the government is the one doing the expressing. This isn’t that hard to imagine.
“Both of these have been destroyed by the Democrats you probably vote for.”
Agree with your stance on the Democrats. I’m a Constitutional literalist even when it inconveniences me, unlike some people…