>>>You can’t bring Chabad rabbis to defend Chabad views.
This is as ludicrous as saying that you, as a litvisher, can’t defend litvisher views! (mind boggling isn’t it?)
Furthermore, surprising as it may be, you are currently engaging in discussion with a Lubavitcher who is defending Lubavitch views!
According to your logic, we shouldn’t be having this discussion in the first place.
We should change the rules of the coffeeroom:
Lubavitchers may only defend Litvishers, and Litvishers may only defend Lubavitchers.
Liberals may only defend conservatives (you can’t bring liberals to defend liberals) and conservatives may only defend liberals.
Gadolhadorah may only defend ujm, ujm may only defend Gadolhadorah.
(Not such a bad idea actually. Would be quite interesting)
P.S. I have no idea what Rabbi Schochet wrote, and honestly, it is as significant to me as the RCA Statement itself (completely insignificant).
I’m just amused by Neville’s line of reasoning.