Unless Joseph, she says “Eini zan mimcha u’nichsei m’lug sheli” then she gets to keeps her metzios as well. We don’t know if hse did that or not, but in the movie she gave him the money, either as a matana or in light of the basic din that what a woman finds belongs to her husband since he supports her. What I found interesting about this movie was complete lack of comment on it from the rabbinic leadership. entertainment and the venues in which it occurs seems to occupy alot of time among gedolim. The recent flap over concerts, the frive to regulate recorded music are examples of this. Why was this movie, which was shown in movie theatres and other places where genders sit together, ignored? Why was there no fear that the advent of this film might lead to a weakening of the chareidi spirit of seperatism?
Menu