I’m with yitayningwut and SJSinNYC. For every compelling proof there’s a compelling counterargument. We cannot rely on these so-called proofs alone. The kiruv orgs are doing a disservice by oversimplifying it like that. It makes things easier to say that those who aren’t satisfied by these proofs don’t want to believe, but that’s not intellectually honest.
SJS I actually do find the fact that antisemitism always existed and still exists today to be compelling, since it is not logical. Of course I wouldn’t call it proof in the sense of a mathematical proof.