Msseeker, as we all know, the mother kept running to Hadassah (not the other way around) telling them her child wouldn’t gain weight. Of course, Hadassah gave her the benefit of the doubt, and began looking for an organic cause. By definition, that involves medical tests. They did not begin any treatments or chemo, contrary to the sheker you write, just tests. They also inserted a feeding tube to help the child eat.
When complaints from other patients and suspicions from nurses started coming in, they put in a camera and caught her starving the child. At that point they removed her from the scene, and the child began to thrive. After a week or so, he was sent to an uncle and is fine.
As far as why they put her in jail at first. That is standard. If one commits murder, or attempted murder as the case was here, first an arrest is made, and only later do the courts and appropriate authorities make the determination as to what sentence she will get, or if she needs confinement in an institution. They do not assume at the outset that a perpetrator is mentally ill. They merely take steps to lock up the person until it can be determined that it is safe to release them on bail until trial. This is the same as the system in the USA or any free country, I believe. This woman could be a dangerous murderer, until determined otherwise. If she were black, you would have no kashyas.
Do doctors ever make mistakes. Of course. It can happen anywhere. But there is no evidence here that that was the case. It is obvious that anti-zionism is your negia here, as you freely bring up all kinds of irrelevant historical controversies in the course of your writing, making it clear what your goal is.
If, as you say, the child was always fine, and the Mengele doctors caused his condition, kindly explain why the mother had a healthy boy admitted to the hospital in the first place, (and she did this repeatedly). I assume Mengele didn’t kidnap the child and forcibly take him to the hospital. Don’t you see that the chronological sequence is completely out of order according to your version of the story. Any rational person can see this.
And if the child did have some serious condition that was misdiagnosed and mistreated by the hospital, how did sending him to the uncle cure him? How many serious illnesses do you know of where the cure is to send the patient to an uncle and no medicines or treatments are necessary? In addition, the mother insisted surgery be performed on a different child against the advice of doctors, who felt it was unecessary (she claimed he had symptoms of appendicitis, I believe).
Come on now, you know this was all a big bluff, but if one can “get” the Zionists with it, why not go ahead?
Meanwhile, everybody knows Hadassa has a sterling reputation for excellence, and even the head of the Eida Chareidi at the time that all this was going on, went there himself for a procedure. They treat all types, secular, Chareidi and Arab with warmth and expertise.