Daas: “The ???? of ??? ????? should apply to any ?????”
But I already clearly demonstrated that it does NOT.
Again NO. They are independent ???? ???? and therefore not permitted by the shechita, Also they may not be sold to a goy even if they develop in dead meat, clearly not because they obtained the status of their host.
This is what we have been discussing the past week, and as I have repeatedly mentioned Rav Vaye quotes this heter from Rav Falk’s sefer on ????? ??????. BTW there is no teshuva from Rav Falk on the topic in Machaze Eliyahu, and Mod42 has not responded to my request to forward the teshuva you sent. Your hesitations are accurate, we have already discussed most of them. #1 I have demonstrated that this is very likely if not certain, #2 I have explained previously and in this post that there is no such thing as becoming “part of the krill” other than ????, which certainly does not apply according to the ???”? and probably according to the ??”? and ??”? as well. Even if it did it would only be like??? ?????. Three Rav Vaye addresses this and disagrees with Rav Vozner. He differentiates between travelling parallel from one fruit to another and when a large fish ingests a small fish with a worm in its stomach. I think this ????? is logical, but admittedly it is the weakest link.
Again Rav Vaye writes that Rav SZ Auerbach Rav Fischer and Rav Abba Shaul were ???? based on exactly this ????.