Daas: “According to the ???? we have discussed, even if it was observed going from the stomach to the flesh, it would be ????.”
100% true. While Rav Vaye quotes and explains Rav Falk’s heter, he personally does not agree, as I have mentioned in the past.
“There is no reason to believe that based on the new information, all of the ??????, who then said ????, would now say ????, just as R’ Elyashiv and several others have”
No, the new evidence presented by Rav Revach proves that anisakis originate outside the flesh of the fish. This is only relevant to those who were previously matir based on the assumption that Chazal permitted flesh-worms because they do NOT come from outside. For those who permit the worms even knowing they come from outside as I am proposing and quoting numerous Poskim who agree, the new discoveries are irrelevant and there is no reason in the world to change their mind.
“In Rav Vaye’s letter which was sent to YWN, it says that Rav Falk’s original ????? was in “????? ?????? ??????”.”
I know and said so, but I don’t have access to that sefer or any newer teshuva of his. Mod42 has still not forwarded your pdf and they deleted your email address.
I assume you are referring to ?? ??: ?”? ?????. However Tosafos only writes this relating to worms that are ???? ?? ???? and not ones that come from outside.