Reply To: Anthony's Verdict

cherrybim – “You keep on saying that but there is no evidence at all that anyone did anything; only that Casey is an idiot.”

And I’ll keep saying it until you get my point. You obviously think that circumstantial evidence can’t be enough to be considered “beyond a reasonable doubt”. Yet many, many cases -Courts have found people guilty with just circumstantial evidence. IMHO and the opinion of many others in this country, this case, even though it’s based on circumstantial evidence, exceeds the standard of “beyond a reasonable doubt”!

“Regarding your previous post; as much as we want to believe them, police are known to lie on the stand.”

Again, you failed to understand my point. Whether police should be believed more than anyone else, I said to this – I understand if this belief disqualifies potentional jurors. But my disbelief was on your statement that cops are believed less than e/o else and they need to have corroborating evidence to be believed. Why in the world shouldn’t they be believed the same as e/o else? Are cops the only ones whom have ever lied on the witness stand?!?!

I don’t know if you’re a liberal or not, but these views that you present are the most ludicrous I’ve ever heard!