Reply To: NASI Initiative

DaasYochid: As I mentioned, I was using “10%” as an example to keep things simple.

“With the proposed system, all of the girls get married, albeit a few years later. “

First off, only Has-em has the ability to say “all of the girls get married”.

Second– I think mathematically it just is not true. All you are doing is creating MORE older girls in the future. Instead of the 3 or 4% that you say get left behind….that will become 8 or 10% (due to the incentives skewing who gets married). You will have an even BIGGER problem in a few years. You still haven’t solved the “supply” side of the equation. Those 8 or 10% of girls are still going to be up against the “younger population” for dates.