HERE is my closing arguements , since my wife is getting nervous from me spending to much time posting.and not being avail for her.
dy said I think would require the shikul hadaas of a dayan to determine if it’s reasonable to expect the buyer to either see it on the jacket, or know that it’s common for CDs to be rented.
if the dayan’s shikul hadass says that he did not have to know it was a rental.(which i think a dayan would certainly say) Then even if the buyer was aware of the terms . the inyan is not ????? ????? which makes it considered ????? ???? and its void.
good bye and noce meeting you all because a coerced get ????? ???? is void.