squeak you misunderstood my post
i was responding to this statement: “The existence of a creator does NOT mean the existence of a deity who presently controls the world.”
this statement implies that the existence of a creator does not necessitate that there is currently an actively controlling diety.
my response was maybe *the fact of a creator* does and maybe it doesnt absolutely imply *current control*
A maybe implies B. i have to think about it
that the clockmaker is still here is emminently provable by logic. i dont believe in leaps of faith