Reply To: Justice in Balto.?

Raphael Kaufman -“As a matter of procedure and law, a confrontation that leads to a fight is the fault of the one who initiated the confrontation.”

Are you that PC brainwashed that you don’t see the injustice here? This isn’t a bar room fight. His testimony clearly stated that he went back to the “victim” to TALK to him, not to disarm him. Upon approaching the “victim” – he came running towards him menacing the stick. You have no proof of the Shomrim guy ever even wanting a confrontation.

Why must you defend this Judge? Because you think that in the Good Ole USA there isn’t any Gov. anti-semitism?

Enough with your fancy-foot work talk -legal ease -this a classic case of Miscarriage of Justice.

And even if the “victim” testified (which we know he didn’t say anything) that the guy’s intention was to disarm him and he never menaced anybody, but the guy knocked him down and hit him with the radio – I still say the Yid should have been found innocent.

Why? Maybe the “victim” is telling the truth and not the Shomrim guy? Simple; because anybody who has an intention of disarming s/o doesn’t go out without a weapon. “Well maybe he didn’t have anything besides his radio?” Every car has a tire iron & esp. s/o trained in the Israeli army wouldn’t get out for a “confrontation” without a weapon. To say differently is just trying to fool e/o how this was a “Just” decision!