Reply To: Bishul Akum?

Home Forums Controversial Topics Bishul Akum? Reply To: Bishul Akum?

#883201
hello99
Participant

DY: YD 53:4 IS a chumra. See Shach and Taz that we are Meikil with any minimal Tlia.

So is 48:12, because a child has no Ne’emanus.