Home › Forums › Controversial Topics › Bishul Akum? › Reply To: Bishul Akum?
December 22, 2011 1:08 pm at 1:08 pm
#883203
hello99
Participant
However, HaRav Moshe Feinstein in Igros Moshe YD 1:45 and 46 explicitly rules like those who are altogether lenient, as the sole issue is Chasnus which is not relevant. This is also the position of the Tzitz Eliezer, Rav Ovadia Yosef, Rav Neventhal and Rav Belsky.
The bottom line is that I remain with my original position; the Halacha is that it is Mutar, but there are grounds to be Machmir.