Reply To: Bishul Akum?

Home Forums Controversial Topics Bishul Akum? Reply To: Bishul Akum?

#883253
☕ DaasYochid ☕
Participant

Hello99,

You are correct that the Shach does not seem to agree with the Ran who includes a Mechalel Shabbos in the general Gezeira against Goyim.

The B”Y paskens like the Rashb”a, so I don’t think the Sha”ch would argue. I don’t learn the Sha”ch like you.

It’s in 73:14 (after the one you quoted). The one you quoted is not his maskana; he’s still presenting the shaila, and limiting it to where there’s no chashash issur. What I quoted is his psak. You should look up the TT”V as well.

you should be careful when quoting vol 8.

Yes I know, but the OCR software I used to copy and paste doesn’t chap. 🙂

BTW, I heard that they printed a 9th volume. What do people say about its reliability?

I don’t know; what’s interesting is that the Rav Feinsteins, in the hakdamah to 9, insist that 8 is reliable. Although I’ve heard of specific teshuvos that they privately say are “mistakes”.

I assumed Health was referring to a raw cholent. If it was 1/3 or 1/2 cooked, and there was no direct amira, would the hana’ah not be muttar as tosefes hana’ah?