Home › Forums › Controversial Topics › Bishul Akum? › Reply To: Bishul Akum?
uneeq -“I responded to you no less than 3 times.”
And I’ve responded to your Naariskeit every time.
“You may argue that the heating elements don’t reach the deoraysa -glowing red hot- level, although according to the famous chazon ish, “chatzi shiur m’doraysa” and therefore even if it will never glow its still an Issur deoraysa. etc…”
Buy you really don’t read my posts. I already conceded it can be red hot & it still isn’t Ossur M’doraysa!
“2) The problem of amira leakum is simpler. You cannot tell a goy to do a melacha for you on shabbos.
So as long as it’s not fully cooked, or it’s cold, it would be a definite Issur. etc…”
I said this type of cooking is D’rabbonon!
“3) Health- I mentioned what you said over here already (see right below). Although as DY points out, there is still an Issur of bishul. I pointed that out too. Only if it’s fully cooked AND still not-cold/hot will it be muttar to tell a goy. etc…”
It’s only an Issur D’rabbonon -so Ameira L’acum would be Mutter L’tzorech Godol.
“Nice misquote of what I said. All I mentioned there is that its good that one of the bullys is off the local streets. I never said that I was happy that he’s in jail. And I never said all the sikrikim should be thrown in jail, even though that might bring the geula faster than I can pack my luggages.”
You implied so originally. Only after me calling you out on this -did you do an about face! I got your number -you can’t fool me!