Home › Forums › Controversial Topics › Bishul Akum? › Reply To: Bishul Akum?
Health,
The oven did not cool -it’s Klor from the MB -95 –
I’m not talking about that case. I’ll quote the R’ma which I am referring to:
??? ?????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ?? ??????? ???????? ???
???????? ???? ??? ???? ??? ????? ?? ???? ?????? ????? ???? ????? ???? ??”? ?? ??????? ?????? ???????
Whatever they had, they didn’t have more than one and the flame was still on.
No, it had cooled, which is why the servants moved the pots to the heating oven and lit it.
“The Biur Halacha doesn’t stop at the words “tzorech Shabbos”, he also says “v’ain lo eitzah acheres”.”
You put in words that it doesn’t say, neither in the Rema or the B’H
I put in no words that weren’t there, as I said, the context is clearly not your imagined case.
DY -“Do you care to explain why you don’t think it’s a diyuk (which, as I explained, is the simple p’shat, in context)?”
I did already and I’ll quote from above:
“And how do you know what the “the” is refering to? Maybe it’s left over pots from Fri. nite & he’s hungry?”
I posted that before your post was visible.