Reply To: Bishul Akum?

Home Forums Controversial Topics Bishul Akum? Reply To: Bishul Akum?

#883461
Health
Participant

DY – “That being the case, besides for the issurim of amira l’aku”m and bishul aku”m, I think there’s a third issur of muktzeh (unless in your 150 pages of mareh m’komos on muktzeh someone holds that if you thought food was cooked, it’s not muktzeh even though it was actually raw). Only the meat might not be a problem (I think some contemporary poskim hold raw meat is muktzeh because it’s no longer common to eat raw meat).”

Even though this post isn’t addressed to me -I had to comment.

Your posts are getting funnier and funnier. Now Muktzeh and soon you will telling me what I did was Chillul Shabbos D’oraysa.

Do you really expect anybody to take your words seriously?

Did you ever learn the Halachos of Muktzeh?

I won’t even answer this because it’s too amusing.