557: Firstly, i heard a shiur from Rabbi Shraga Kallus at a chasuna last week, and he listed some sources for bedeken – none of them halachical but more symbolical. But he bought the rishonim that it is nissuin – and why can that not work ???? ???
“To see this, note that nisuin can take place only after kiddushin”
???? ??? ?’… ???? ????? ?? ??? ???? ????????. The ???? ?????? notes that Chuppa comes before Kiddushin in the Brocho – and he says the reason is because we do bedeken first, that is already a nissuin.
I didn’t quite follow what you wrote before, but I know i also thought that it was impossible until i saw a Rashi in Kesuvos ?? ?? [if i remember correctly], by the inyan of ??? ??? ???? ?????? ????? ???? — it is clear there that a kiddushin preceded by a nessuin is fine. [It did have a ?????? to ?????]