The working suspicion is that someone who has immediate and private access to these horrible sites, is liable to be suspected as possible having visited these forbidden sites.
A. As yehudayona pointed out, such things could be accessed any number of ways, including via an old-fashioned phone.
B. So what? Is it wrong? Sure. But there are plenty of things that one can do wrong that don’t make one passul l’eidus. Why does this? How does this fit into the classically defined cases?
The Wolf