Reply To: NY is #1

yehudayona – I’m not wrong. I doubt the case in Vermont was a case of religious freedom. In other words, why didn’t they allow the wedding? Because they didn’t want to expose their kids to it, like the farm or because they were personally against it. While I wish the law let anybody against it discriminate, but then that law wouldn’t be much of a law. So I understand the law and the lawsuit in Vermont, but I don’t understand a law that stops religious freedom like by the farm in NY. And how could anybody “Frum” vote for any politician who supported this law? What did they think – that religious people wouldn’t be persecuted once this law was enacted?