Home › Forums › Decaffeinated Coffee › Noachide law › Reply To: Noachide law
So N’s obligation to C remains unchanged by unforeseeable supervening actors. This is different from what I remember contracts class teaching.
__
Where the supervening circumstances have so changed by the time of performance of a promise, that to compel the parties to perform the promise under conditions so altered, would require them o do something, which in fact they had never agreed to do. This is called the frustration of contract.
The doctrine of frustration arises from the coming into existence of facts not within the contemplation of the parties, beyond the control of parties.
The four instances where this doctrine is applied are:
d)Loss of skill
__
Glad I promised to uphold U.S. law not crude Noachide law on this issue..