Reply To: ??? ???? ?? ????

Home Forums Bais Medrash ??? ???? ?? ???? Reply To: ??? ???? ?? ????

#945297
Chortkov
Participant

I still don’t understand how ???? ????? answers the question – your tayneing that ???? ????? is a shvachkayt in the lav, and therefore it is easier for the asei to get around it.

a) The asei is also shvach, because the same she’aile can stop the chiyuv to be megaleach? So why can’t you compare to a normal case where the asei and lo saseh are equal?

b) Even after the chiluk, if sof kol sof you have a way out that you are not forced to be oiver on the lo sasei to be mekayem the asei, then you would have to do that, which in this case means being shoel on the nezirus?

I think using what Halevi is saying, that there is a time when she’aile cannot be used, you can answer the second question – sometimes b’poel it is takah not shayich to pater yourself, but it is still a shvachkeit in the lav that it was made with a self-destruct mechanism.

(It might also answer the first question, because in the lo saseh is shayech shelah, but in the aseh – to be megaleach – en hochi nami it is shayich to be shoel and STOP the aseh from coming, but once the chiyuv is chal there is no way out because by then the nazir will have finished the nezirus (Apparently a gemoro; I know nothing about nezirus)

{So yitaningwut – what Halevi said is quite relevant because I don’t understand your tirutz besides for that.}